Graffiti On November Goldaniga James opened the debate on the issues of urban Lozio. In December, the newspaper hosted replicas Alex Domenighini (Mayor of Malegno) and Igor Ducommun. Here you can read the rejoinder of Goldaniga (found below articles already published). The debate continues ...
is well known that their unions are also a small "caste" for which you take the part. If the conclusion of his article , where he says "those who stayed for five years," the mayor of Malegno refers to the undersigned, reject the assumption it to the sender. Apart from family problems (and who does not?) In the last five years I was wide awake and while they, the environmentalists, they were whispering to the B & Bs in Borno-Zanaglio, by silence / agreement on Lozio (as reported in our How Green Valley "Graffiti in January 2008 - and for the destruction of someone Lozio Friends of Nature has also resigned), I gave her contribution to the preservation of the village of Castle (I'll talk about in an upcoming issue). Moreover when the mayor of Malegno still wore short pants, always gave myself a contribution to the salvation of the Cerreto di Dossi Ossimo from a municipal solid waste landfill for Media Vallecamonica. Now, from "very rigorous historical documents", but with a good memory, I remember in one of the first interviews with Teleboario, the former mayoress Fiorani asserted that he would only permit the construction of 90 houses and only in S. Nazzaro and then he blocked everything. If mathematics is not an opinion, from the 90 "houses" to 500 "condominietti", there is a difference of no less than 410 dwellings. However if this abnormal flow of cement is not responsible for the Fiorani, as mayor, promoting a new plan (or TMP) and even the inaction of the environmentalists, and not even those who, by his own admission, let alone the Fiorani, then whose responsibility is ? The mayoress Fiorani was only able to block my book on the history of Lozio for four years, but then, when they resort to legal action, a dedication of rods rather flattering (although not required) as I put him in that place, publishing work in economics, in black and white instead of color, only 200 copies and with a poor quality. Just because the work she had not ordered (by the way the work had already been paid by the junta last year). I apologize for this reference, but I took off a pebble in the shoe because it supports the popular wisdom that "it is better to die with the hump with the crop." In addition, the mayor of Malegno tells me that when you have managed well, usually, as has happened to him, he is re-elected. Why does not Fiorani was re-elected and loziesi have preferred an eccentric and extravagant "Tone"?
share of 99% that stated in his article Igor Ducommun while I disagree with him when he sees my part "over-indulgence that has been the work of the junta Pizio. If so I had not spoken negatively of the Villa Mozart, Rinaldi, the Curia, and no need for a third country and between Sucinva Laveno. If you read carefully my article of December, you should understand two basic things. First. I said that after all the original design of the "village" of Pizio was architecturally and aesthetically better than the filth that are made later in S. Nazzaro, chamber and Villa. Second, that environmental groups should be activated in the same way when planning the destruction is permitted by an administration right, center or left. (Assuming that these categories are still valid and civic especially for teams). And I would add that it is much more deplorable when the destruction of the territory is allowed by those who consider themselves left-wing junta and environmentalist. Nothing but righteousness!
0 comments:
Post a Comment