receive and publish the reply of James to Goldaniga letter and Eliana Baffelli Fabio Giorgi in the controversy started by the same Goldaniga pages Graffiti in November 2010.
I do not know who they are and Eliana Baffelli Fabio Giorgi, but I think can be two directors or two supporters of the former mayoress Fiorani. First of all advise them to read the response that the mayor of Malegno sent me privately, in which Hector alludes to the position of porter at the time was neither understood nor accepted (the letter is from me or from the mayor himself).
I doubt the two are very malicious and biased. This summer I was invited to stage a photo exhibition on Magnolini and to submit my novel, the Pro Loco of Lozio in collaboration with the City of Lozio and Exhibition Hall of the Villa Fontana. (Ergo the activities of the undersigned is not the work of Michael Pizio). About phoned Mayor Antonio Giorgi send a letter informing me that the paper will clarify how he found where the municipality at the time of its establishment, the financial difficulties, and more, pointing even to the condominietti would not have been given to the town (if I understand it) the cost of construction and infrastructure works.
Lozio When I came to I saw in detail the destruction building (which has nothing to do with my cultural activity), and I reported spontaneously without any prompting, flu or fuorvianza.
second point. Mr. Michael Pizio was instructed by me to process two chapters on the photographs of the people of Lozio (whose titles I could not know) and partnerships, both old and new. At the time, given the reports Fiorani-Pizio I asked if he had anything to the contrary on this collaboration and mayoress told me that it was well accepted. About the adjective "notorious" I do not know what the two allude, explain better, because the Italian vocabulary recitation "which has a bad reputation" (of which I am not). The allocation of resources for the book, for those who are not myopic had a purpose and a commercial promotion. 1. was intended to pay homage to All 400 family history of the country (with a circulation of 200 copies could not be certain to do, about how the software handled the 200 copies that no one has seen it?) 2. because in summer they go back to around 1000 migrants Lozio and about 2000 tourists, the book (2000 copies budgeted for) would be sold, not only recovering the cost, but with a profit margin. Unfortunately, I see that the junta has failed Fiorani not even get a commercial benefit from a cultural operation. (Tacàcc know how to bric Cavrie - said in 1923 Arnaldo Canossi). Therefore, the budgeted expenditure "significant" for the two, was totally recovered!
Finally I ask you a question. The money recovered from the Council before Quetti for the printer has printed 200 copies ridiculous in economics where they are gone, as have been used? Today there are people who seek to Lozio book and not find it. But has not been a sabotage to this book because it included the name of Michael Pizio? If so it would be petty because in the Bible it is said that "the mistakes must not be part of the fathers upon the children?" It would be good so it's better that Fabio Giorgi Baffelli and Eliana are documented on the case before insinuate some doubts miserable, with the ' attempt to throw mud on a clear and transparent collaboration (the machine Mud Saviano) to some extent at a loss. I which has already been collaborated with the current mayor Giorgi on the book of the Castle of Noble and his successor on the recovery of the Castle itself. In addition to bias I do not keep any part of the mayor, because as I said in my previous article, I consider them "a small caste", a business committee.
James Goldaniga
0 comments:
Post a Comment